harold ford, bite me
uh, no. verizon in a broadband coalition? color me beyond skeptical. dubious, even.
uh, no. verizon in a broadband coalition? color me beyond skeptical. dubious, even.
Posted by
looj
at
11:21 PM
0
comments
Labels: communications, policy, politics
Streaked and faded
Glowing brightly still
Perhaps you will emerge again tomorrow
To rise and fade again once more
Posted by
looj
at
9:29 AM
0
comments
remind me why the daily show is again the only one saying this to dems?
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Mass Backwards> | ||||
| www.thedailyshow.com | ||||
| ||||
Posted by
looj
at
1:11 PM
0
comments
let the shrillness continue. brad delong compiles some new WaPo transgressions.
Posted by
looj
at
2:14 PM
0
comments
why does the daily show consistently bring more to bear to our discourse than other media outlets?
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-december-3-2009/oliver-s-travels---switzerland
Posted by
looj
at
12:11 PM
0
comments
Labels: media
it is nice when companies actually take affirmative steps to aid privacy protection and respond to user requests.
http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=190423927130
Posted by
looj
at
10:32 AM
0
comments
Labels: media
despite the "stop snitching" movement starting in Baltimore, the most popular player for the Ravens, and arguably the player with the most street credibility, is currently still playing in the NFL because he snitched on two friends to avoid a murder trial.
Posted by
looj
at
10:46 AM
0
comments
Labels: sports
blinds of cascading light
reprise their role, pushing me
towards the ill-lit corners
of my conscious mind
Posted by
looj
at
2:52 PM
0
comments
article on ny mag sex diaries. interesting to read. a lot of experiences are very distinctly new york. others more universal. some are hoping for love and a bit inspiring, struggling through similar struggles, seemingly out of place in Gen Y, sexy and interesting and taking post-feminism in an appropriate direction, taking it maybe a bit too far, and one who is almost beyond description, a quintessential spoiled, upper-class, entitled brat rich kid living in NYC.
and one that i think i'm in love with.
Posted by
looj
at
12:15 PM
0
comments
before American Apparel started using actual porn stars in their ads.
Posted by
looj
at
2:30 PM
0
comments
how are people allowed to get away with saying this? and why are the democrats not leveraging this? i know why fox news and the other sensationalist outlets are not covering it, but why not others?
essentially calling for a military coup to solve the "Obama problem" is not something that should be allowed.
Posted by
looj
at
10:31 AM
0
comments
i think so.
boondock saints II
Posted by
looj
at
4:22 PM
0
comments
Labels: movies
i had always heard about Nixon's anti-semitism, paranoia, and underhanded political machinations. but i don't think it ever was clear until i read analysis and transcripts dealing with his theory of a "Jewish cabal" designed to damage him politically. frankly, the man was a monster, and why anyone would idealize him is beyond me. we'll put aside his liberal social agenda; negative income tax, health care reform, anyone?
choice quotes:
President Nixon: All right. I want a look at any sensitive areas around where Jews are involved, Bob. See, the Jews are all through the government, and we have got to get in those areas. We’ve got to get a man in charge who is not Jewish to control the Jewish . . . do you understand?
President Nixon: Second, most Jews are disloyal. You know what I mean? You have a—you have a [White House Consultant Leonard] Garment and a [National Security Adviser Henry A.] Kissinger and, frankly, a [White House Speechwriter William L.] Safire, and, by God, they’re exceptions. But, Bob, generally speaking, you can’t trust the bastards. They turn on you. Correct? Am I wrong or right?
Posted by
looj
at
4:41 PM
0
comments
Labels: politics
could the noticeable uptick in vitriol and demagoguery, breaking news and frenzied rants, emanating from glenn beck have anything to do with his new book, to be published on Tuesday? no, of course not. surely it has to be a coincidence.
if the product description on amazon wasn't laughable enough as it is, enjoy this gem: "Idiots...can be found only by looking for people who hide behind stereotypes, embrace partisanship, and believe that bumper sticker slogans are a substitute for common sense."
sound familiar?
Posted by
looj
at
3:47 PM
0
comments